Filed under: Investing
Although we don’t believe in timing the market or panicking over market movements, we do like to keep an eye on big changes — just in case they’re material to our investing thesis.
What: Shares of Provectus Biopharmaceuticals , a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing therapies to treat oncologic and dermatologic conditions, plunged as much as 20% after the company issued a press release refuting claims made against the company from an investment community blog.
So what: According to Provectus’ response, it refuted what it believed to be numerous inaccuracies in the blog. Specifically, Provectus notes that PV-10, its investigational metastatic melanoma therapy, hasn’t failed the breakthrough therapy designation, but is awaiting a decision from the Food and Drug Administration as to the status of its request. Provectus also denies any affiliation with stock promoters, and assured its investors that the most important patent covering PV-10 expires in 2031 and not 2016. In response, at least two law firms have opened investigations into potential wrongdoing as of yesterday afternoon.
Now what: Thanks to high-profile short-sellers like Citron Research and Muddy Waters the ability to tear a company apart in a public format has never been easier. Provectus shares were absolutely clobbered on these allegation which, as of now, the company vehemently denies.
So what should you do? I’d suggest sticking to your current investment thesis in the company because all that really matters is whether or not Provectus can get its phase 3 study of PV-10 off the ground. The initial phase 2 results were encouraging and are the primary reason Provectus’ share price saw such rapid appreciation. However, it reported its final top-line data from this trial in Oct. 2012, and shareholders have to be wondering what’s with the hold-up? If Provectus is simply hoping for a breakthrough therapy designation and then to find a partner based on that designation that’s one thing. But if Provectus fails to get the breakthrough designation, then what? For now, given the speculation surrounding Provectus, I’d personally suggest remaining on the sidelines until we have more clarity about when a phase 3 trial for PV-10 is scheduled to begin.
Provectus may offer investors plenty of potential, but even it could struggle to keep pace with this top stock over the long run
Give me five minutes and I’ll show how you could own the best stock for 2014. Every year, The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer hand-picks 1 stock with outstanding potential. But it’s not just any run-of-the-mill company. It’s a stock perfectly positioned to cash in on one of the upcoming year’s most lucrative trends. Last year his pick skyrocketed 134%. And previous top picks have gained upwards of 908%, 1,252% and 1,303% over the subsequent years! Believe me, you don’t want to miss what could be his biggest winner yet! Just click here to download your free copy of “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2014” today.
var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; FoolAnalyticsData.push({ eventType: “ArticlePitch”, contentByline: “Sean Williams”, contentId: “cms.126924”, contentTickers: “”, contentTitle: “Why Provectus Biopharmaceuticals Inc. Shares Plummeted”, hasVideo: “False”, pitchId: “681”, pitchTickers: “”, pitchTitle: “”, pitchType: “”, sfrId: “” });
The article Why Provectus Biopharmaceuticals Inc. Shares Plummeted originally appeared on Fool.com.
var ord = window.ord || Math.floor(Math.random() * 1e16);
document.write(‘x3Cscript type=”text/javascript” src=”http://ad.doubleclick.net/N3910/adj/usdf.df.articles/articles;sz=5×7;ord=’ + ord + ‘?”x3ex3C/scriptx3e’);
Sean Williams has no material interest in any companies mentioned in this article. You can follow him on CAPS under the screen name TMFUltraLong, track every pick he makes under the screen name TrackUltraLong, and check him out on Twitter, where he goes by the handle @TMFUltraLong.
Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 – 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init(“9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9”);
function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent(“on”+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}
addEvent(window, “load”, function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, “load”, function(){new PickAd();})
var themeName = ‘dailyfinance.com’;
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push([‘_setAccount’, ‘UA-24928199-1’]);
_gaq.push([‘_trackPageview’]);
(function () {
var ga = document.createElement(‘script’);
ga.type = ‘text/javascript’;
ga.async = true;
ga.src = (‘https:’ == document.location.protocol ? ‘https://ssl’ : ‘http://www’) + ‘.google-analytics.com/ga.js’;
var s = document.getElementsByTagName(‘script’)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();
Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments
Source: Investing